Over the past decade, the sixty or so days a year on which a major geopolitical or macro shock landed carried close to sixty per cent of the FTSE 100’s equity premium. Of the senior executives asked last year, fewer than one in five reported a dedicated capability to see those days coming.
That gap is not an information problem. Directors are not short of headlines, data feeds or scenario decks. They are short of someone who will read the map, take a position, put a date on it, and still be there when it is tested.
We decline conflicts rather than manage them, we do not lobby, and every judgment we publish carries a date and a number. Everything else follows from those three rules.
Pricing the straits, canals and cables the global economy quietly depends on.
Somewhere in every portfolio there is a strait. It rarely appears on a risk register, but it is there: in the freight assumptions of a retailer, the feedstock of a chemicals business, the latency of a trading desk that has never thought about the seabed its packets cross.
Read the note→Not because the danger is unknown, but because the wrong thing is being counted. A register records how much passes through a route. The loss comes from what it costs to send it another way, on the day the route shuts. That number is usually several times larger, and it is knowable now.
Dependence is not measured by transit volume. It is measured by the cost of the best alternative on the day the route closes, and by the unpredictability that arrives with it — a covenant written against an average has no defence against a variance. Priced that way, exposures filed under logistics, other turn out to be among the largest lines on the register.
{{ e.body }}
{{ e.asked }}
The cost of fixing a dependence rises at exactly the moment you need it fixed.
Alternative routes, berths, second sources and repair capacity can all be reserved today at prices that assume nothing will happen. They stop being available in the week that something does. And a dependence of any size is fixed by a programme rather than a memo, which is the other reason to start before it is urgent.
Conflicts are declined, not managed.
A large firm manages a conflict with an internal wall. We decline the second mandate. Where two parties want opposing answers to the same question, only one of them can have ours.
We do not lobby.
We read governments; we do not work them. A firm that sells access cannot also sell an honest assessment of the people it needs access to.
Every judgment dated and numbered.
A view with a date on it can be checked against events. So every note separates what the evidence supports from what cuts against it and what nobody has observed at all, and states the condition under which we would change our mind. We do not issue a single probability, because one number hides exactly that distinction and a committee handed one plans as though the third category did not exist. Where we are wrong we say so under the next number.
Four forms, in the order clients usually need them.
A retained relationship with the board or the investment committee. One senior analyst, reachable, who knows the business before the crisis arrives rather than after it.
Each political dependence priced at the cost of its best alternative on the day it closes. Most registers understate this by a multiple, and the review says by how much.
Three futures, each with a trigger observable in public data within a week. A position that needs one of them to be true is a wager, and should be sized as one.
The judgment taken into the room and put to questions. One exposure, its triggers, and what would have to be true for the view to change, argued in front of the people who have to act on it. A written note answers the question asked; a briefing finds the ones nobody wrote down.
And, as often matters more, who we are not.
Global footprint, no in-house geopolitical function, and a board newly obliged to show oversight. Cannot justify a standing team; can justify a standing brief.
One market, one strait, one supplier, one licence. Must disclose a material risk without triggering the very consequence being disclosed. Needs judgment, not more data.
Buying or holding assets whose value rests on assumptions about the map. Wants the exposure priced before the committee votes, and one name accountable for the view.
Anyone wanting access to a minister, a favourable regulatory outcome, or a report that agrees with a decision already taken. We decline that work, and say why.
Every note is numbered and dated, so it can be checked against what happened next. A new one appears each week. Follow the feed if you want them as they publish; there is no mailing list and nothing to sign.
Because the analysis a board can buy is rarely the analysis a board can act on, and almost none of it can be checked against what happened next.
Geopolitical risk has become a governance obligation. It arrived on the register faster than any method for managing it, so directors are now accountable for a class of exposure their organisation cannot yet price. The market answered with more information. That was never the shortage.
A large firm sells a practice: a methodology, a team, a deck. This work needs a person who has read the file, will commit to a view, and can be reached on the day it matters. That cannot be delegated, which is why we do not intend to scale it. What stands behind a judgment here is the record of judgments — numbered, dated, and revised in public when they were wrong. That is a slower thing to build than a biography, and a harder thing to fake.
Most analysis is undated, unnumbered and therefore unfalsifiable, which makes it comfortable to produce and useless to act on. A judgment with a date on it can be checked against what happened, and every note we publish carries the condition that would prove it wrong. That discipline is the product.
Narvik was an ordinary northern port until the map was contested. Then it was worth a battle.
Nothing about the harbour changed. What changed was the iron ore moving through it and the alternatives available to the people who needed it. Its value was always there; it was simply unpriced until the day it bound.
That is the whole method. Every business holds a dependence of the same kind, carried at zero on the register because it has never yet bound. We find it, price it, and say what to do about it while doing something is still cheap.
We will tell you whether we are the right firm for it. If we are not, we will usually say who is.
Thank you. Your message is with the firm.
We answer every enquiry, usually within two working days. If the matter will not wait, write directly to enquiries@narvikstrategy.com.
What we do with personal data, why we are allowed to, and how to make us stop. Written to be read rather than to be defensible.
The controller for the personal data described here is NARVIK LTD, a private company limited by shares registered in England and Wales under company number 17298860, whose registered office is 66 Paul Street, London EC2A 4NA. The firm trades as Narvik Strategy.
Write to enquiries@narvikstrategy.com for anything in this notice, including requests about your own data. Correspondence marked for the Data Protection Lead reaches the person accountable for it.
Registration with the Information Commissioner’s Office has been applied for and paid. The reference will be published here on confirmation.
Only what you send us, and what a web server records in the ordinary course.
We do not ask for special category data, and you should not send it. We do not collect data about children.
We do not sell personal data, and we do not share it for anyone else’s marketing. We do not add enquirers to a mailing list. We do not profile you, and no decision affecting you is taken by automated means. We do not use your correspondence to train machine-learning models.
We do not otherwise disclose the fact of a correspondence, let alone its contents. Discretion is the product.
Some providers process data in the United States. Where they do, we rely on the United Kingdom extension to the EU–US Data Privacy Framework where the provider is certified under it, and otherwise on the International Data Transfer Agreement or the Addendum to the European Commission’s standard contractual clauses, supported by a transfer risk assessment.
Under the United Kingdom General Data Protection Regulation you may ask us for a copy of your data, ask us to correct it, ask us to delete it, ask us to restrict what we do with it, object to our relying on legitimate interests, ask for it in a portable form, and withdraw any consent you have given.
Email us to exercise any of these. We answer within one month. If a request is genuinely complex we may take up to two further months, and we will tell you within the first month if that is the case. We may ask you to confirm who you are before we send data anywhere.
Tell us first. Write to enquiries@narvikstrategy.com, marked for the Data Protection Lead. We will acknowledge your complaint within thirty days and tell you what we intend to do about it, as the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 requires of us.
If you are still dissatisfied you may complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire SK9 5AF, or through ico.org.uk. You may also pursue a remedy in the courts. Complaining to us first does not remove either right.
We review this notice at least once a year and whenever what we do changes. The date at the top is the date of the current version. Material changes will be described here rather than made quietly.
We set nothing on your device. Our host sets three identifiers that we did not choose and do not receive, and this notice names them.
Nothing. Narvik sets no cookies and no equivalent identifiers of its own. There is no advertising technology on this site, no pixel, no fingerprinting, and no third-party script that watches what you read. Our own measurement is cookieless: it counts pages, referrers and countries in aggregate and stores nothing on your device.
Our hosting provider, GoDaddy, appends a performance-monitoring script to every page served from this domain. It is added by the server after our own code ends, so it does not appear in the file we publish and we cannot remove it from here. It sets three identifiers:
_tccl_visitor — set by GoDaddy to tell one browser from another for hosting performance measurement. Retained for up to one year.
_tccl_visit — set by GoDaddy to group requests into a single visit, for the same purpose. Retained for the browsing session.
_scc_session — set by GoDaddy for session continuity on the hosting platform. Retained for the browsing session.
We did not choose these, we do not receive the data, and nothing on this site depends on them. We have asked our host to switch the script off. Until that is done they are declared here rather than left undeclared.
Separately, our host keeps standard server logs, which include your internet protocol address, your browser type, and the pages you requested. Those are not cookies and nothing is stored on your device, but they are personal data, so they are covered by our privacy notice. We keep them for ninety days and use them to keep the site available and secure.
Under the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations 2003, as amended by the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 and in force from 5 February 2026, a cookie used solely for statistical purposes may be set without prior consent where the resulting data is used only by the operator of the site and a free means of objecting is offered. Our own measurement sets nothing, so the question does not arise for it. The three identifiers above are set by our host for its own purposes, so we do not claim that exception on their behalf.
If you would rather they were not set, block cookies for this domain in your browser; nothing here will stop working. If we ever add anything of our own that stores information on your device, we will name it on this page, say what it does and for how long, and put a plain opt-out beside it before we switch it on.
Every current browser lets you block or delete cookies, and you are free to do so without any loss of function on this site. The Information Commissioner’s Office keeps plain guidance on this at ico.org.uk. Browser settings alone are not treated as consent under the current guidance, which is why nothing on this page asks you to agree to anything.
The terms on which this site is published. Reading it does not make you a client, and nothing on it is advice.
This site is published by NARVIK LTD, a private company limited by shares registered in England and Wales under company number 17298860, whose registered office is 66 Paul Street, London EC2A 4NA. The firm trades as Narvik Strategy.
By using the site you accept these terms. If you do not accept them, stop using it.
It describes what the firm does and publishes its notes. That is the whole purpose. It is not a platform, it does not host an account, and it takes no payment.
Nothing here is investment, legal, tax, accounting or regulatory advice, nor an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any financial instrument. Reading a note creates no advisory relationship and no duty of care to you.
Every judgment is the firm’s view on the date given, and may be revised without notice. Notes are written to be tested against events; where we turn out to be wrong we say so in a later note rather than amending an earlier one.
Narvik Strategy does not carry on regulated activities and is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.
We own the text, images and design of this site, or we license them. You may read it, print it for your own use, and quote briefly from it with attribution to Narvik Strategy and the number of the note.
You may not republish it at length, sell it, present it as your own, or use it as training data for a machine-learning model. Licensed photography may not be extracted or reused at all.
Ordinary email is not a secure medium and we cannot guarantee it in transit. We treat correspondence as confidential from the first message, but confidentiality is not the same as engagement: a client relationship begins only when a signed engagement letter is in place.
Sending an enquiry does not oblige us to accept a mandate, and we decline work that conflicts with a client we already hold.
We do not promise that the site will be uninterrupted or error-free, and we may change, suspend or withdraw any part of it without notice. Content may be removed once it no longer represents the firm’s view.
Where we link elsewhere, it is for reference. We do not control those sites, we do not endorse them, and we are not responsible for what they contain.
We do not exclude or limit liability for death or personal injury caused by our negligence, for fraud or fraudulent misrepresentation, or for anything else that cannot lawfully be excluded.
Subject to that, we are not liable to you for any loss or damage arising from your use of this site or reliance on anything published here, including loss of profit, loss of business, loss of anticipated saving, loss of data, or any indirect or consequential loss. If you are a consumer, these terms do not affect your statutory rights.
These terms and any dispute arising out of them are governed by the law of England and Wales, and the courts of England and Wales have exclusive jurisdiction.
We may revise these terms. The date at the top is the date of the current version, and the version in force is the one published when you use the site.